This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Gonzaga Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:42540/feed
ISSN 0046-6115
General
Vol. 52, Issue 1, 2017January 01, 2017 PDT

OBERGEFELL v. HODGES: RIGHT IDEA, WRONG ANALYSIS

Megan M. Walls,
equal protectiongay marriagelgbt
Photo by ipse dixit on Unsplash

Articles in Vol. 52, Issue 1, 2017

Vol. 52, Issue 1, 2017
  • THE LODESTAR METHOD FOR CALCULATING A REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEE IN WASHINGTON
    Philip A. TalmadgeThomas M. Fitzpatrick
  • FOR RICHER OR FOR POORER: HOW OBERGEFELL V. HODGES AFFECTS THE TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS THAT OPPOSE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
    Herman D. Hoffman
  • STANDING TOGETHER: AN ANALYSIS OF THE INJURY REQUIREMENT IN DATA BREACH CLASS ACTIONS
    Daniel Bugni
  • VIOLATING FREE SPEECH IN THE WAR ON OPIOID ADDICTION: THE WASHINGTON LEGISLATURE’S VOICE IN THE DOCTOR’S OFFICE
    Lucas Newbill
  • OBERGEFELL v. HODGES: RIGHT IDEA, WRONG ANALYSIS
    Megan M. Walls
  • PEOPLE OR PLACE: WHICH APPROACH IS SUPERIOR WHEN IT COMES TO ADDRESSING EDUCATION REFORM THROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING POLICY?i
    Sydney Hawthorne
Gonzaga Law Review
Megan M. Walls, OBERGEFELL v. HODGES: RIGHT IDEA, WRONG ANALYSIS, 52 Gonzaga Law Review 133 (2017).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system