ISSN 0046-6115
Vol. 52, Issue 1, 2017January 01, 2017 PDT
FOR RICHER OR FOR POORER: HOW OBERGEFELL V. HODGES AFFECTS THE TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS THAT OPPOSE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
FOR RICHER OR FOR POORER: HOW OBERGEFELL V. HODGES AFFECTS THE TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS THAT OPPOSE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
Articles in Vol. 52, Issue 1, 2017
Vol. 52, Issue 1, 2017
- THE LODESTAR METHOD FOR CALCULATING A REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEE IN WASHINGTONPhilip A. TalmadgeThomas M. Fitzpatrick
- FOR RICHER OR FOR POORER: HOW OBERGEFELL V. HODGES AFFECTS THE TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS THAT OPPOSE SAME-SEX MARRIAGEHerman D. Hoffman
- STANDING TOGETHER: AN ANALYSIS OF THE INJURY REQUIREMENT IN DATA BREACH CLASS ACTIONSDaniel Bugni
- VIOLATING FREE SPEECH IN THE WAR ON OPIOID ADDICTION: THE WASHINGTON LEGISLATURE’S VOICE IN THE DOCTOR’S OFFICELucas Newbill
- OBERGEFELL v. HODGES: RIGHT IDEA, WRONG ANALYSISMegan M. Walls
- PEOPLE OR PLACE: WHICH APPROACH IS SUPERIOR WHEN IT COMES TO ADDRESSING EDUCATION REFORM THROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING POLICY?iSydney Hawthorne
Herman D. Hoffman, FOR RICHER OR FOR POORER: HOW OBERGEFELL V. HODGES AFFECTS THE TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS THAT OPPOSE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 52 Gonzaga Law Review 21 (2017).