ISSN 0046-6115
Vol. 58, Issue 3, 2023June 13, 2023 PDT
The Myth of the Appropriate Response to Trauma: “Abnormal Reactions” as Evidence of Guilt
The Myth of the Appropriate Response to Trauma: “Abnormal Reactions” as Evidence of Guilt
psychologycredibilitydemeanorabnormal reactionsguilttraumaAmanda KnoxInterrogationjury determinationswrongful convictions
Articles in Vol. 58, Issue 3, 2023
Vol. 58, Issue 3, 2023
- The Myth of the Appropriate Response to Trauma: "Abnormal Reactions" as Evidence of GuiltCarrie Leonetti
- "Pleas" Don't Hand Up: The Viability of Telephone Consumer Protection Act Claims Based on Calls by Automatic Telephone Dialing Systems After _Facebook v. Duguid_Trevor Cook
- Demanding (In)Authenticity: The State's Ironic Search for a Valid Sex IdentityCarly Johnson
- Protecting Reasonable Expectations of Privacy in an Age of Drones: A Framework for Balancing Privacy Interests with the Utility of Drones in Law EnforcementJacob Montgomery
- All Abort! How Health Care-Providing Vessels Can Offer Abortion Services Prohibited Under State Law to Individuals Living in Coastal Southern StatesEcho D. Fatsis
- The Reins Act: Disruptive Partisan Tactic, or Vehicle for Effective Legislation?Zachary J. Murnion
Carrie Leonetti, The Myth of the Appropriate Response to Trauma: “Abnormal Reactions” as Evidence of Guilt, 58 Gonzaga Law Review 379 (2023).