Vol. 21, Issue 3, 1986July 16, 2020 PDT
Evidence of a Defendant’s Refusal to Submit to a Breathalyzer Test is Admissible Only For the Purpose of Controverting a Contention Raised by the Defendant. State v. Zwicker, 105 Wn.2d 228, 713 P.2d 1101 (1986)
Evidence of a Defendant’s Refusal to Submit to a Breathalyzer Test is Admissible Only For the Purpose of Controverting a Contention Raised by the Defendant. State v. Zwicker, 105 Wn.2d 228, 713 P.2d 1101 (1986)
Steve Brooks, Evidence of a Defendant’s Refusal to Submit to a Breathalyzer Test Is Admissible Only For the Purpose of Controverting a Contention Raised by the Defendant. State v. Zwicker, 105 Wn.2d 228, 713 P.2d 1101 (1986), 21 Gonzaga Law Review 819 (2020).