ISSN 0046-6115
Vol. 21, Issue 3, 1986July 16, 2020 PDT
State and Local Plant Closing Laws: The Case Against Preemption
State and Local Plant Closing Laws: The Case Against Preemption
Articles in Vol. 21, Issue 3, 1986
Vol. 21, Issue 3, 1986
- The Refugee Act of 1980: A Humanitarian StandardMark Gibney
- State and Local Plant Closing Laws: The Case Against PreemptionJames A. Douglas
- SEC Regulation of the Accounting Profession: Rule 2(e)Christine Neylon O'Brien
- Competency and Criminal Responsibility in WashingtonBrett C. Trowbridge
- Best Interests of Children and the Interests of Adoptive Parents: Isn't It Time for Comprehensive Reform?Constance J. Miller
- Evidence of a Defendant's Refusal to Submit to a Breathalyzer Test is Admissible Only For the Purpose of Controverting a Contention Raised by the Defendant. State v. Zwicker, 105 Wn.2d 228, 713 P.2d 1101 (1986)Steve Brooks
- Specifying the Intended Crime in Burglary Prosecutions-Intent to Commit a Specific Crime Is Not an Element of Attempted Burglary That Must Be Included In the Information, Jury Instructions, or the Trial Court's Findings and Conclusions. State v. Bergeron.Michael Walker
- Survey of Washington Law-Civil Procedure-Limitation of ActionsPaul J. Triesch
- Discrimination-Title VII and the Business Necessity DefenseMadeleine Carmel Wanslee
- Book ReviewRobert W. Critchlow
James A. Douglas, State and Local Plant Closing Laws: The Case Against Preemption, 21 Gonzaga Law Review 603 (2020).