This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Gonzaga Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:5765/feed
ISSN 0046-6115
General
Vol. 52, Issue 3, 2017August 15, 2019 PDT

WHEN AND WHY SUSPECTS FAIL TO RECOGNIZE THE ADVERSARY ROLE OF AN INTERROGATOR IN AMERICA: THE PROBLEM AND SOLUTION

Myeonki Kim,
constitutional lawself incriminationcriminal law
Photo by Bruno Martins on Unsplash
Gonzaga Law Review
Myeonki Kim, WHEN AND WHY SUSPECTS FAIL TO RECOGNIZE THE ADVERSARY ROLE OF AN INTERROGATOR IN AMERICA: THE PROBLEM AND SOLUTION, 52 Gonzaga Law Review 507 (2019).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system